Monday, January 27, 2020

A Dolls House as a Problem Play

A Dolls House as a Problem Play A Dolls House is one of the major realistic problem plays of Henrik Ibsen. In A Dolls House, Nora Helmer is the main character. She is the wife of Torvald Helmer, who is a bank manager. The story happens when Christmas is coming. To keep the job in Torvalds bank, Krostad, who is the man that Nora borrowed money from to pay the trip to Italy to cure her husband, threatens her that he will tell Torvald she forged her fathers signature to borrow money if she doesnt help him to talk with Torvald. She tries to do what Krostad wants because she is fearful that she will lose the family when Torvald knows about that. However, what she is afraid of happen. She spends a whole night to think about what happened, and she realized that Torvald and she dont understand each other. Finally, she decides to leave him and her children to discover her own life where she can find her own self. By separating the various themes of faux marriage and broken family, Henrik Ibsen focuses on the place of women with Nora as his central character. Nora chooses divorce at the end to free not only Torvald but also herself. Just holding a marriage without love, communication, trust, and toleration, the marriage between them cannot last forever. The reasons that lead to divorce in the play are relevant in the world today. Love is the first base to build a strong marriage. Without love, marriage will be destroyed easily. In A Dolls House play, the marriage of Torvald and Nora is seemed very happy, but truthfully, Torvald didnt really love Nora. With him, she is woman who is under his control. After her forging her fathers signature is disclosed, she realizes that her marriage is built without their real love. Torvald pretends to love Nora, and she pretends to love him. She feels that she is living a lie while she lives with him as a doll. She did and thought the same as what he said. Nora claims, à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦You arranged everything to your tastes, and I acquired the same tastes. Or I pretended toà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦ I dont really knowà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦ I think it was a bit of both, sometimes one thing and sometimes the other. When I look back, it seems to me I have been living here like a beggar, from hand to mouthà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦(Ibsen 858). When Torvald asked whether she had been happy living with him or n ot, she answers no although she hopes that she was. Therefore, building a marriage without love definitely hurts the relationship between husband and wife as it hurt the relationship between Torvald and Nora. A balance of love is needed in any marriage. Another quality that leads to failed marriage in the play and the world today is the lack of communication. Two soul-mates need to communicate in a relationship. Because Nora understands Torvalds character and doesnt want to let him worry, she didnt talk to him about borrowing money from Krogstad to cure his illness. Moreover, when they talk to each other, they always say about money and work. In the Act I, Nora is seen as a spendthrift her husbands eyes. She always says money when Torvald asks her what she wants. Because of that fact, Torvald seem to be a person who really loves his wife when he agrees with all her requests, but he didnt know what she really wants. The lack of communication makes them cannot understand each other. In the play, Nora realizes that they didnt talk enough through eight years when she says, We have now been married eight years. Hasnt it struck you this is the first time you and I, man and wife, have had a serious talk together? (Ibsen 858). The answer wa s no. That is why Nora didnt tell her husband about her secret. Just because of the poor communication, a marriage can never hope to live onward. Although love and communication are important in marriage, trust is also necessary to build a marriage stronger. Torvald had almost no trust in Nora. When Nora needed some money to buy some things for Christmas, he jeered at her. He state, à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦if only you really did buy something for yourself with it. But it just get mixed up with the housekeeping and frittered away on all sorts of useless thing, and then I have to dig into my pocket all over again (Ibsen 815). With spendthrift character, Nora lacks trust in her husband, and it is not good for their marriage. It makes them have no trust or even suspect each other. Without trust, marriage becomes impossible. Last but not least, toleration is also necessary in marriage to help them closer. Although they have a good relationship, if they dont have toleration, they will be separated. In the play, both Torval and Nora dont have toleration. This is one of the reasons that lead to their divorce. When Torvald know about what Nora have done, he very angry and doesnt want to forgive her for her fault. He even requests that she has to stay away form him. When he reads the second letter from Krosgtad, he is calmed down and forgives for her fault, but it was too late because she realizes that he didnt love her. She is the same as her husband. She cannot forgive for a person who cares nothing more than him. She finally decides to leave her family to discover a new life where she can find her own self. She says, If I never reach any understanding of myself and the thing around me, I must learn to stand alone. Thats why I cant stay here with you any longer (Ibsen 859). With the strong tone, her determi ned attitude about leaving is shown up although Torvald begs her to stay with him. In conclusion, A Dolls House is a great play of Henrik Ibsen. A Dolls House leaves us a message that holding a marriage without four qualities above is impossible. The marriage of Torvald and Nora Helmer had many problems because they got married without real love, hold their marriage without trust, have the poor communication to understand each other, and have no toleration to forgive for their faults. A Dolls House teaches us a lesson that getting married with our loves is easy, but keeping our marriage can last forever is not easy as we thought. Work Cited Ibsen, Henrik. A Dolls House. Literature for Composition. Ed. Sylvan Barnet et al. 8th ed. New York: Longman, 2007. 813-862.

Sunday, January 19, 2020

Gender Stereotypes Among Childrens Toys Essay -- Stereotypes Toys Gen

Gender Stereotypes Among Children's Toys   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   When you walk into the toy section of any store, you do not need a sign to indicate which section is the girls’ side and which section is the boys’ side. Aside from all the pink, purple, and other pastel colors that fill the shelves on the girls’ side, the glitter sticks out a lot as well. The boys’ toys however are mostly dark colors – blue, black, red, gray, or dark green. The colors typically used on either side are very stereotypical in themselves.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  I noticed the girls’ toys engaged fine motor skills more than the boys’ toys did. The girls have several different types and sizes of dolls to choose from – however, this also makes dolls or items used with dolls (Barbie clothes, doll clothes, doll houses, Barbie cars, and doll furniture) over half of all the products in the girls’ section. This shows the stereotypical attitude that all girls like to nurture and will someday be expected to be mothers and the primary care giver for their children. Other toys I noticed that were very stereotypical were the child size vacuum, broom, and kitchen set. Even at this young age we teach girls it is part of their role to cook and clean.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Another stereotype I saw demonstrated in the girls section was the idea that all girls are animal lovers. A large section of the girls’ side was filled with different stuffed animals or other toy animals like â€Å"Pound Puppies† or â€Å"My Little Ponies†. Mostly the girls’ toys used fine motor sk...

Saturday, January 11, 2020

A Man for All Seasons: Play About Thomas More Essay

A Man for All Seasons written by Robert Bolt is a play about a man, Thomas More, who lives by his beliefs and eventually dies because of his beliefs. The play has a simple theme, played out through a few main characters. Rich’s character and personality prevent More from being successful. The first appearance of Rich in the play happens right away in the first scene. This is the first time you get to see his personality. Rich and More have an argument, as to whether every man is capable of being bribed. Rich believes that money, status or women, can bribe anyone. More doesn’t agree with him completely but is intrigued with his belief that a man can be bought with materials. Rich is referring to the fact that he has read Machiavelli, which More later teases him of. Machiavelli’s morals are different from More’s. More admires his private conscience above things like personal advancement, but Machiavelli gives advice about the opposite. Rich’s reference to Machiavelli seems to show that he and Thomas Cromwell will spare no one to achieve success later in the play. At the end of the scene More tells the duke that Rich needs a job, but that he doesn’t necessarily recommend Rich, which displays More’s view of Rich. More is a well respected man, so his opinion on someone would be a valid one. Right from the beginning of the play you can see the difference between Rich’s and More’s characters. More obviously cares for Rich’s well being. Rich’s lust for power and wealth in the end gets the best of him and any kind of guidance or advice given from More is ignored. It’s interesting to note that More does care for Rich. In his interaction with Rich in the first scene, More teaches by testing Rich by offering him the goblet, letting Rich know that the goblet was a bribe and is therefore ? dirtied’. More understands Rich’s faults from the beginning of the play, but he tries to nurture Rich anyway. This is another excellent example of More’s superior character. It’s unfortunate that Rich eventually perjures himself to sentence More to death. A Man for All Seasons focuses on Rich’s rise in status almost as much as it does the fall of More. More and his beliefs get him death, while Rich gains greater status and more and more wealth, at the cost of his friend More. Throughout the book you can see Rich fall deeper and deeper into his own loss of innocence. At the end of Act One, Rich and Cromwell are having a conversation. Cromwell offers Rich the job as Collector of Revenue in return he wants information about the goblet given to him by More. Rich ? laments’ that he has lost his innocence, â€Å"I’m Lamenting. I’ve lost my innocence (44). † The scene seems to show that Rich has sold his soul to the Devil. In this scene Rich isn’t entirely sure about what he is doing which shows that at this point there is still some humanity left in him. The final fall of Rich’s character occurs at the end of the play when Rich takes the stand at Mores trial. Rich is asked to testify about his conversation with More before the trial on what More’s stance was on what the King was doing. Rich says, â€Å"Parliament has made our King Head of the Church. Why will you not accept him?†¦ Then he said parliament had no power to do it (94). † By perjuring against More he has pulled the final straw and officially hands himself over to greed and lust for power. More’s standout character is shown once again when he says to Rich, â€Å"In good faith, Rich, I am sorrier for your perjury than my peril. † In the end for perjuring against More Rich is given the job of attorney General of Wales. Throughout the play we see the fall of Thomas More and the rising of Rich. The contrast of Rich’s gain in status and Mores loss of status, really makes the play. It seems that the author doesn’t try to make his characters stand for anyone thing in particular, but in Rich’s case he is a symbol of the tendency to surrender to the temptation of wealth and status. Throughout the play you never get any real depth of Rich as a person. This seems to be what the author is trying to do because Rich works as a perfect contrast to More without taking anything away from More’s character. Without the contrast of Rich’s character we wouldn’t get to see who More really is. Rich’s character shows us all what impact money and status can have on us.

Friday, January 3, 2020

Film Analysis Of The Emoji Movie - 2078 Words

The world is changing, people are communicating with each other in ways people even as recently as 40 years ago could have never dreamed of. The words â€Å"Emoji Movie† are one of a new generation, one of a new voice, a â€Å"this is how we talk now and we don’t care if you like it or not† generation. This movie is something that could have only been made in 2017. This movie is what the world needed to define a generation that needs to be defined. It shows themes of outcasting, loneliness, bullying, being yourself, feminism, strong female and male characters, doing what is right and just having fun along the way. That sounds like life right now, and life right now sounds like The Emoji Movie. Life right now also sounds like The Emoji Movie because†¦show more content†¦He fails at his emoji job because of this and runs away, taking the Hi-5 emoji, who recently has been kicked out of the â€Å"favorites† emoji and feels depressed. They search for a need to belong, and be accepted where they need to be too properly function in the society ran by Smiler, the emoji who controls the jobs all the other emojis have. Smiler wants Hi-5 to accept that he’s not a favorite emoji and wants Gene to be destroyed by killer robots, who are not emojis but exist in this universe for some reason. They run away and find a girl hacker named Jailbreak, who is an emoji, but left that lifestyle behind to become a hacker who agrees to help the misfits on their quest to be back in the emoji world and accepted for who they are and not get killed by killer robots. On this journey they venture through apps searching for a way to get back. Gene’s parents wish to find their son and have him not be killed for being different. Further messages come when Jailbreak, is SPOILER ALERT revealed to be a princess emoji who didn’t want to be a princess so she left that lifestyle behind to go off the grid and become her own thing, in this case a hacker. This along with her general image makes her believed to be a strong feminist character who doesn’t want to fit into the heteronormative princess role. Where it all goes wrong is the plot, which is worthless garbage to say it bluntly. When of the earliest scenes in your movie involves distinguished British actorShow MoreRelatedRhetorical Analysis Of The Emoji Movie1005 Words   |  5 PagesIntroduction: In the past few weeks there has been great backlash on a movie that had been released called ‘ The Emoji Movie’. Megan Garber, a staff writer at ‘ The Atlantic ‘ situated in Washington releases an article on why ‘The Emoji movie ‘ fails. The goal I want to achieve by writing this essay is to identify how the author builds the argument of the topic using different rhetorical strategies and check if the author established solid credible evidence to validate the arguments she made. SummaryRead MoreHarry Potter And The Deathly Hallows4316 Words   |  18 PagesHarry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 2 Critical Analysis of the trailer By Lydia Turner Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 2 released in 2011 and directed by David Yates. Warner Bros distributed the film. It is based upon Harry Potter the Deathly Hallows written by J.K Rowling that was split in to two parts this film was the final film of the whole series, which consisted of eight films. The films target audience are people of the ages of 15 to 24 however younger and older audiencesRead MoreMagical Discourse Markers Used On Mandarin1895 Words   |  8 Pagesthe most common discourse marker used in Mardrain that is Ni Shuo Ne? which translated is what do you think? in the different situation that has a different meaning. I will focus on the discourse marker Ni Shuo Ne used in real life and film and television and novels and analyze the different meaning in different situation Ni Shuo Ne is one of the most frequent discourse marker use in Mandarin as a daily conversation. However, the reference to the discourse marker of Ni Shuo Ne

Thursday, December 26, 2019

Causes of World War I and the Rise of Germany

The early years of the 20th century saw tremendous growth in Europe of both population and prosperity. With arts and culture flourishing, few believed a general war possible due to the peaceful cooperation required to maintain increased levels of trade as well as technologies such as the telegraph and railroad. Despite this, numerous social, military, and nationalistic tensions ran beneath the surface. As the great European empires struggled to expand their territory, they were confronted with increasing social unrest at home as new political forces began to emerge. Rise of Germany Before 1870, Germany consisted of several small kingdoms, duchies, and principalities rather than one unified nation. In the 1860s, the Kingdom of Prussia, led by Kaiser Wilhelm I and his prime minister, Otto von Bismarck, initiated a series of conflicts designed to unite the German states under their influence. Following the victory over the Danes in the 1864 Second Schleswig War, Bismarck turned to eliminating Austrian influence over the southern German states. Provoking war in 1866, the well-trained Prussian military quickly and decisively defeated their larger neighbors. Forming the North German Confederation after the victory, Bismarcks new polity included Prussias German allies, while those states which had fought with Austria were pulled into its sphere of influence. In 1870, the Confederation entered into a conflict with France after Bismarck attempted to place a German prince on the Spanish throne. The resulting Franco-Prussian War saw the Germans rout the French, capture Emperor Napoleon III, and occupy Paris. Proclaiming the German Empire at Versailles in early 1871, Wilhelm and Bismarck effectively united the country. In the resulting Treaty of Frankfurt which ended the war, France was forced to cede Alsace and Lorraine to Germany. The loss of this territory badly stung the French and was a motivating factor in 1914. Building a Tangled Web With Germany united, Bismarck set about to protect his newly formed empire from foreign attack. Aware that Germanys position in central Europe made it vulnerable, he began seeking alliances to ensure that its enemies remained isolated and that a two-front war could be avoided. The first of these was a mutual protection pact with Austria-Hungary and Russia known as the Three Emperors League. This collapsed in 1878 and was replaced by the Dual Alliance with Austria-Hungary which called for mutual support if either was attacked by Russia. In 1881, the two nations entered into the Triple Alliance with Italy which bound the signatories to aid each other in the case of war with France. The Italians soon undercut this treaty by concluding a secret agreement with France stating that they would provide aid if Germany invaded. Still concerned with Russia, Bismarck concluded the Reinsurance Treaty in 1887, in which both countries agreed to remain neutral if attacked by a third. In 1888, Kaiser Wilhelm I died and was succeeded by his son Wilhelm II. Rasher than his father, Wilhelm quickly tired of Bismarcks control and dismissed him in 1890. As a result, the carefully built web of treaties Bismarck had constructed for Germanys protection began to unravel. The Reinsurance Treaty lapsed in 1890, and France ended its diplomatic isolation by concluding a military alliance with Russia in 1892. This agreement called for the two to work in concert if one was attacked by a member of the Triple Alliance. Place in the Sun Naval Arms Race An ambitious leader and the grandson of Englands Queen Victoria, Wilhelm sought to elevate Germany to equal status with the other great powers of Europe. As a result, Germany entered the race for colonies with the goal of becoming an imperial power. In a speech in Hamburg, Wilhelm said, If we understood the enthusiasm of the people of Hamburg alright, I think I can assume that it is their opinion that our navy should be further strengthened, so that we may be sure that no one can dispute with us the place in the sun that is our due. These efforts to obtain territory overseas brought Germany into conflict with the other powers, especially France, as the German flag was soon raised over parts of Africa and on islands in the Pacific. As Germany sought to grow its international influence, Wilhelm began a massive program of naval construction. Embarrassed by the German fleets poor showing at Victorias Diamond Jubilee in 1897, a succession of naval bills were passed to expand and improve the Kaiserliche Marine under the oversight of Admiral Alfred von Tirpitz. This sudden expansion in naval construction stirred Britain, which possessed the worlds preeminent fleet, from several decades of splendid isolation. A global power, Britain moved in 1902 to form an alliance with Japan to curtail German ambitions in the Pacific. This was followed by the Entente Cordiale with France in 1904, which while not a military alliance, resolved many of the colonial squabbles and issues between the two nations. With the completion of HMS Dreadnought in 1906, the naval arms race between Britain and Germany accelerated with each striving to build more tonnage than the other. A direct challenge to the Royal Navy, the Kaiser saw the fleet as a way to increase German influence and compel the British to meet his demands. As a result, Britain concluded the Anglo-Russian Entente in 1907, which tied together British and Russian interests. This agreement effectively formed the Triple Entente of Britain, Russia, and France which was opposed by the Triple Alliance of Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy. Powder Keg in the Balkans While the European powers were posturing for colonies and alliances, the Ottoman Empire was in deep decline. Once a powerful state that had threatened European Christendom, by the early years of the 20th century it was dubbed the sick man of Europe. With the rise of nationalism in the 19th century, many of the ethnic minorities within the empire began clamoring for independence or autonomy. As a result, numerous new states such as Serbia, Romania, and Montenegro became independent. Sensing weakness, Austria-Hungary occupied Bosnia in 1878. In 1908, Austria officially annexed Bosnia igniting outrage in Serbia and Russia. Linked by their Slavic ethnicity, the two nations wished to prevent Austrian expansion. Their efforts were defeated when the Ottomans agreed to recognize Austrian control in exchange for monetary compensation. The incident permanently damaged the already tense relations between the nations. Faced with increasing problems within its already diverse population, Austria-Hungary viewed Serbia as a threat. This was largely due to Serbias desire to unite the Slavic people, including those living in the southern parts of the empire. This pan-Slavic sentiment was backed by Russia who had signed a military agreement to aid Serbia if the nation was attacked by the Austrians. The Balkan Wars Seeking to take advantage of Ottoman weakness, Serbia, Bulgaria, Montenegro, and Greece declared war in October 1912. Overwhelmed by this combined force, the Ottomans lost most of their European lands. Ended by the Treaty of London in May 1913, the conflict led to issues among the victors as they battled over the spoils. This resulted in the Second Balkan War which saw the former allies, as well as the Ottomans, defeat Bulgaria. With the end of the fighting, Serbia emerged as a stronger power much to the annoyance of the Austrians. Concerned, Austria-Hungary sought support for a possible conflict with Serbia from Germany. After initially rebuffing their allies, the Germans offered support if Austria-Hungary was forced to fight for its position as a Great Power. Assassination of Archduke Ferdinand With the situation in the Balkans already tense, Colonel Dragutin Dimitrijevic, head of Serbias military intelligence, initiated a plan to kill Archduke Franz Ferdinand. Heir to the throne of Austria-Hungary, Franz Ferdinand and his wife, Sophie, intended to travel to Sarajevo, Bosnia on an inspection tour. A six-man assassination team was assembled and infiltrated into Bosnia. Guided by Danilo Ilic, they intended to kill the archduke on June 28, 1914, as he toured the city in an open-topped car. While the first two conspirators failed to act when Ferdinands car passed by, the third threw a bomb that bounced off the vehicle. Undamaged, the archdukes car sped away while the attempted assassin was captured by the crowd. The remainder of Ilics team was unable to take action. After attending an event at the town hall, the archdukes motorcade resumed. One of the assassins, Gavrilo Princip, stumbled across the motorcade as he exited a shop near the Latin Bridge. Approaching, he drew a gun and shot both Franz Ferdinand and Sophie. Both died a short time later. The July Crisis Though stunning, Franz Ferdinands death was not viewed by most Europeans as an event that would lead to general war. In Austria-Hungary, where the politically moderate archduke was not well-liked, the government elected instead to use the assassination as an opportunity to deal with the Serbs. Quickly capturing Ilic and his men, the Austrians learned many of the details of the plot. Wishing to take military action, the government in Vienna was hesitant due to concerns about Russian intervention. Turning to their ally, the Austrians inquired regarding the German position on the matter. On July 5, 1914, Wilhelm, downplaying the Russian threat, informed the Austrian ambassador that his nation could count on Germany’s full support regardless of the outcome. This blank check of support from Germany shaped Viennas actions. With the backing of Berlin, the Austrians began a campaign of coercive diplomacy designed to bring about a limited war. The focus of this was the presentation of an ultimatum to Serbia at 4:30 p.m. on July 23. Included in the ultimatum were 10 demands, ranging from the arrest of the conspirators to allowing Austrian participation in the investigation, that Vienna knew Serbia could not accept as a sovereign nation. Failure to comply within 48 hours would mean war. Desperate to avoid a conflict, the Serbian government sought aid from the Russians but were told by Tsar Nicholas II to accept the ultimatum and hope for the best. War Declared On July 24, with the deadline looming, most of Europe awoke to the severity of the situation. While the Russians asked for the deadline to be extended or the terms altered, the British suggested a conference be held to prevent war. Shortly before the deadline on July 25, Serbia replied that it would accept nine of the terms with reservations, but that it could not allow the Austrian authorities to operate in their territory. Judging the Serbian response to be unsatisfactory, the Austrians immediately broke off relations. While the Austrian army began to mobilize for war, the Russians announced a pre-mobilization period known as â€Å"Period Preparatory to War. While the foreign ministers of the Triple Entente worked to prevent war, Austria-Hungary began massing its troops. In the face of this, Russia increased support for its small, Slavic ally. At 11 a.m. on July 28, Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia. That same day Russia ordered a mobilization for the districts bordering Austria-Hungary. As Europe moved towards a larger conflict, Nicholas opened communications with Wilhelm in an effort to prevent the situation from escalating. Behind the scenes in Berlin, German officials were eager for a war with Russia but were restrained by the need to make the Russians appear as the aggressors. The Dominoes Fall While the German military clamored for war, its diplomats were working feverishly in an attempt to get Britain to remain neutral if war began. Meeting with the British ambassador on July 29, Chancellor Theobald von Bethmann-Hollweg stated he believed that Germany would soon be going to war with France and Russia and alluded that German forces would violate Belgiums neutrality. As Britain was bound to protect Belgium by the 1839 Treaty of London, this meeting helped push the nation towards actively supporting its entente partners. While news that Britain was prepared to back its allies in a European war initially spooked Bethmann-Hollweg into calling on the Austrians to accept peace initiatives, word that King George V intended to remain neutral led him to halt these efforts. Early on July 31, Russia began a full mobilization of its forces in preparation for war with Austria-Hungary. This pleased Bethmann-Hollweg who was able to couch German mobilization later that day as a response to the Russians even though it was scheduled to begin regardless. Concerned about the escalating situation, French Premier Raymond Poincarà © and Prime Minister Renà © Viviani urged Russia not to provoke a war with Germany. Shortly thereafter the French government was informed that if the Russian mobilization did not cease, Germany would attack France. The following day, August 1, Germany declared war on Russia and German troops began moving into Luxembourg in preparation for invading Belgium and France. As a result, France began mobilizing that day. With France being pulled into the conflict through its alliance to Russia, Britain contacted Paris on August 2 and offered to protect the French coast from naval attack. That same day, Germany contacted the Belgian government requesting free passage through Belgium for its troops. This was refused by King Albert and Germany declared war on both Belgium and France on August 3. Though it was unlikely that Britain could have remained neutral if France was attacked, it entered the fray that next day when German troops invaded Belgium activating the 1839 Treaty of London. On August 6, Austria-Hungary declared war on Russia and six days later entered into hostilities with France and Britain. Thus by August 12, 1914, the Great Powers of Europe were at war and four and a half years of savage bloodshed were to follow.

Wednesday, December 18, 2019

Go back to where you came from Essay - 1102 Words

Go Back To Where You Came From Analysis - Religion Go Back To Where You Came From is an Australian documentary/reality show in which participants are given the opportunity to experience what the life of refugee and asylum seeker can be like, albeit edited and packaged for an audience. During the course of the three hour long series, the six individuals not only have the chance to get under the skin of a refugee in terms of achieving a greater degree of insight into what being a refugee really means, but also to get on the viewing audiences nerves in perhaps all or any of the of the first three senses described above. Moreover the refugees participating in the series may ‘get under the skin’ of the programme participants and the†¦show more content†¦I could’ve gone over there with a gun and shot the lot of them. Isn’t that terrible (Go Back To Where You Came From Episode 1 6min17sec) Raye refers to her own space which is disturbed, not by the arrival of individual refugees per second, but by the presence of a building, a physical solid object containing and restraining refugees, this building intrudes into Raye’s visual field and impinges and presses upon her metaphorical skin, the idyllic space surrounding her home. When she says she could have gone there and shot them with a gun, she is not literal as she concedes in her tag question. She is, however, pulling away metaphorically from the object of her disgust. The fact, the image of a gun carries a two-fold effect; the metaphorical â€Å"killing† of the detainees would effectible remove them, and the firing of the gun entails recoil, in which the holder of the gun is thrown backwards from the target being fired at. Darren In contrast to Raye’s discourse of violence, Darren’s disgust for asylum seeking boat people is expressed as moral opprobrium, expressed from the comfort of his own living room, with his family watching TV; Darren; we’re getting bombarded with boat people coming and it was only a matter of time before Christmas Island happened. Seeing children drown after their boat crashed against the rocks. It’s awful. I just couldn’t imagine that position so we need to send a tougher signal out that this is notShow MoreRelatedGo Back to Where You Came from Documentary Analysis Essay786 Words   |  4 PagesTask 1 There are many different views about refugees in Australian society, where illegal boat people and over flowing detention centres are a controversial problem today. Go Back To Where You Came From is a documentary directed by Ivan O’Mahoney about a social experiment that challenges the dominant views of six Australians about refugees and asylum seekers. These six Australians are taken on a 25 day journey where they are placed into the troubled â€Å"worlds† of refugees. For a few of the AustraliansRead MoreAnalysis Of Edgar Allan Poes Go Back To Where You Came From957 Words   |  4 Pagesuncovered. Exploring new worlds, people and places, thrilling the individual to reevaluate their understanding of the world and society transforming perceptions. This is explored in the reality documentary series directed by Ivan O’Mahoney’s ‘Go Back To Where You Came From’ which encapsulates the hardships of asylum seekers catalysing the participants emotion al and intellectual rediscovery. Furthermore, Edgar Ellen Poe’s poem the ‘Raven’ examines the impacts of stress and anxiety of a heartbroken lover antagonisedRead Moreâ€Å"What Do You Want to Be When You Grow Up?† Essay1103 Words   |  5 PagesJennifer Smith English 111 February 16, 2011 Essay One - Revised â€Å"What Do You Want To Be When You Grow Up?† We are usually asked this question very early in life: â€Å"What do you want to be when you grow up?† It’s one of the biggest questions asked of children, from toddlers to teenagers. It’s always asked to help encourage kids to think of their future. After all, how many children really know what they want to do with the rest of their lives? Oh yeah, there are those lucky few who have aRead MoreAnalysis Of The Book The Great Gatsby By F. Scott Fitzgerald1388 Words   |  6 Pagesthere was a boy. His name was Ross Howner. He was only a peasent to most, he lived in a small village called skedia in the far corner of the kindom masonia. Just as every other person though, he had a secret. His secret was far more greater then most. You see, Ross was a warlock, so he had magic. But if anyone found out he would be hung at the sight,  for the kind of Masonia despised magic.  His mother was the only one who knew about his magic, for  she had magic too.  His dad hated magic almost as muchRead MoreSummary : The Hell 785 Words   |  4 Pagesit , it wasn t even worth trying. YOU HAVE A BONER? Oh, what the fuck? The fuck? Ryan whisper-yelled. I don t even wanna know. Brendon s eyes widen a bit, he sunk in his seat even more. *** My butt is hurting, Houston complain for the fifth time already. Same Ryan agreed with Houston. Brendon come on, Houston shouted at her brother to hurry up. Don t rush me, I m already scared to death, don t make it worse! Brendon shouted back carrying his pass out sister in the hospitalRead MoreShort Story721 Words   |  3 Pagesacross from the park! Sylvester wanted to hear more. We sneak in the building. Steal a few blankets from the tramps that live there while they are out, running around looking for food!† â€Å"What if someones there?† â€Å"Well,† Chase heaved in a deep breath, stared at Sylvester and said. Well have to deal with it as we go!† â€Å"Deal with it?† Sylvester asked. â€Å"You arent gonna cop-out on me are you?† Not wanting to look cowardly, he told Chase. â€Å"No, Im not, gonna cop-out on you!† â€Å"Lets go.† They leftRead MoreHow Technology Has Changed My Life982 Words   |  4 Pageshas grown up with technology at their disposal. It is everywhere now. I started using technology when I was six years old, and I fell in love with it. I knew from there on out I was going to grow up using and studying the works of it. The very first piece of technology I have ever used was a desktop computer in 2002. I obtained this item from my grandfather that was into technology at the time also; he wanted to pass down information to me. Being able to grow up with something so sophisticated hasRead MoreIan, Ian And Sarah1134 Words   |  5 PagesOne sunny, bright morning, Ian and Sarah were playing hide and seek in Ian’s backyard. It was Ian’s turn to hide, and he decided to go over the fence into the woods. Sarah will never find me here, Ian thought to himself as he walked deeper into the woods. â€Å"Ready or not, here I come!† he heard Sarah yelling. â€Å"You’re never going to find me!† Ian yelled to Sarah as he jumped over a fallen tree. Sarah looked all throughout the yard and couldn’t find Ian. She remembered that there was a tree stump inRead MoreMilitary Discipline Essay1033 Words   |  5 PagesMilitary Discipline Where to start, lets see discipline in the military from the beginning to now. Well from the start of the civil war the military was not as it is now. Then solders was a solder 24-7 back then, and the only time they had to them self was when the war was over. Now, we still solders 24-7 but we have more personel time to deal with familys and to start a family. But that is up to the solder, anyway over the years the military had to change to keep the morale up in the militaryRead MoreThe Giver Chapter 3 Summary764 Words   |  4 Pagesit was really old so they didnt know what to do? So Jonas was trying to ask someone to go stay with him until they find dwelling to live in but the guy said refused. â€Å"the guy said do you even have a dwelling to live inâ€Å". â€Å"Jonas said No, I couldnt find a dwelling to live in but I only found you†. â€Å"But the guy said sorry I only have one room to live with my family†. Jonas was mad because he didnt know where to live. so Jonas and Gabe kept walking and they were talking to each other. â€Å" â€Å"Gabe asked

Monday, December 9, 2019

Professional Environment for Ethics and Technology - myassignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about theProfessional Environment for Ethics and Technology. Answer: Some Issues for Ethics, Professionalism and Technology An IT Perspective Ethics can be understood as the moral principles that underlie the code of conduct, and action of an individual. Professionalism is the set of skills or competencies expected from a professional (Kurtines 2014). Professional ethics should include moral principles and professionalism (Durkheim 2013). What happened? Prof. Karl Reeds lecture titled Some Issues for Ethics, Professionalism and Technology An IT Perspective highlights some of the ethical issues affecting professional code of conduct, in the Information Technology (IT) industry. It discusses how ethics can have impact social/political scenarios, social behavior, security and authenticity of data/ information, contracting jobs, and surveillance systems (Quinn 2014). It is important to identify and differentiate the responsibilities expected from the organization and compliance to ethical standards. What did it mean to me? Surprisingly. unethical practice in IT industry is not very uncommon. Breach of client contract, divulgence of personal data, providing misleading or incorrect information has been practiced by both agencies and individuals. Working in these scenarios, it is important that professionals know their rights, and responsibilities. One cannot be forced to do unethical work, and consenting to such activity, can indict the individual as an accessory of crime. The Goals and Methods matrix suggested by Turner and Cochrane can be used to analyze the potential complexity of a project. A well defined project has clear objectives, and goals, and provides a clarity of information and expectations (Senescu, Aranda-Mena and Haymaker 2012). Any unethical practice expected from an individual can be easily identified (and disputed) from a well defined project, in contrast to a fuzzy outline, that leaves room for speculation, and promotes sequestering of unethical practices. Ethically, an engineer ought to demonstrate integrity, practice competently, exercise leadership, and promote sustainability. Often adhering to such practices can cause conflict of interest between the job and principles. What value is it to me? As professionals, we have the responsibility to not only serve the organization, but also the society, which is why ethical protocols should get precedence over personal/business objectives. For example, every citizen has the constitutional right to privacy of information. Leaking of sensitive data by Snowden or Manning have only exposed the illegal practice of surveillance (Greenwald, MacAskill, and Poitras 2013). Similarly, leak of police data can threaten the security of individuals, especially if it ends up in the wrong hands. As we see, privatization of government information can lead to data security issues (Fitzgibbon 2013). How it might help me in the future. This knowledge can be helpful in the future to decide the correct curse of action, if faced with such a conundrum. To summarize, any action expected from a professional may or may not be ethical, and therefore an understanding of rights and responsibilities of an individual as a professional and responsible citizen is necessary. Cultural Awareness in Intercultural Communication: Cultural awareness is the simply the cognition of different aspects of culture (values, beliefs, perceptions and practices) and their diversity. It can include the awareness of culturally induced behavior of own self and others (Tomalin and Stempleski 2013). In the modern day, culturally diverse society, intercultural communication is not only important, but is almost unavoidable. What happened? The project analysed the cultural diversity in different groups, with respect to language, beliefs, and practices (Banks 2015). These can be potential hurdles towards communication and team work. For example, religious practices can cause individuals to refrain from work on certain days, or consumption of certain food. Both of these can affect profession or personal relations, and therefore one needs to be sensitive to the others beliefs and practices, to avoid conflicts. What did it mean to me? Analysing cultural diversity sheds light into the heterogenous nature of human behavior, and beliefs. Since thought and action are intrinsically related to cognition, it is particularly relevant in understanding behavior (Kuhl and Beckman 2012). This insight can be useful to maintain a cultural sensitivity within a culturally diverse framework, to avoid any unintentional offense. For example, to refrain from offering certain food that can be offensive on religious grounds. What value is it to me? Much of our social turmoil is fuelled by a lack of cultural sensitivity, in a multicultural environment. This generally results in an alienation of the people belonging to different cultural groups. Knowledge of beliefs and practices of a cultural group is important recognize and implement the proper code of conduct. For example a single colour (like white) can have different cultural meanings- from cleanliness or spirituality (in occidental cultures) to the concept of death (in certain oriental cultures). So, the practice of gift-wrapping with white paper, can have different meanings for different cultures. How it might help me in the future. A knowledge of the social and cultural diversity allows a deeper introspection on how beliefs and practices can influence actions. We can understand when a line has been crossed, and when our behavior can potentially upset someone from a different cultural background. Since todays cosmopolitan/metropolitan society is culturally diverse, it is important to be sensitized to these differences. Teamwork can mean regular and stipulated interaction with individuals from other cultural groups. An effective and positive teamwork can exist if this diversity is acknowledged, and a workable communication and conduct is structured around this knowledge, and can prevent the feeling of discrimination and alienation (Geyer and Schweitzer 2012). References: Banks, J.A., 2015. Cultural diversity and education. Routledge. Durkheim, E., 2013. Professional ethics and civic morals. Routledge. Fitzgibbon, W., 2013. Risk and privatisation. British Journal of Community Justice, 11(2/3), p.87. Geyer, R.F. and Schweitzer, D.R. eds., 2012. Theories of alienation: critical perspectives in philosophy and the social sciences. Springer Science Business Media. Greenwald, G., MacAskill, E. and Poitras, L., 2013. Edward Snowden: the whistleblower behind the NSA surveillance revelations. The Guardian, 9(6). Kuhl, J. and Beckmann, J. eds., 2012. Action control: From cognition to behavior. Springer Science Business Media. Kurtines, W.M., 2014. Handbook of moral behavior and development: Volume 1: Theory. Psychology Press. Quinn, M.J., 2014. Ethics for the information age. Pearson. Senescu, R.R., Aranda-Mena, G. and Haymaker, J.R., 2012. Relationships between project complexity and communication. Journal of Management in Engineering, 29(2), pp.183-197. Tomalin, B. and Stempleski, S., 2013. Cultural Awareness-Resource Books for Teachers. Oxford University Press.